![]() Maybe I'll give Xenial a try at some point in time, but not right now, because my two SD-cards are currently filled. I know that debian is often "too much behind" (which is why I build and install stuff in /opt). My CubieBoard2 has a 1TB WD drive attached, which I've formatted as ext4 (due to I didn't know if btrfs was stable at the time old obsolete web-sites do not get erased, you know). It's actually good to hear some experience. ![]() So while Ubuntu Xenial combined with ZFS is supposed to work flawlessly on x86 (since kernel + DKMS ZFS module comes both from Canonical) situation with the various ARM boards differs since we deal with 2-3 kernel variations per SoC family and there's no one taking care of tight integration between ZFS and kernel (longsleep with his A64 legacy kernel being one exception - but the last time I tried ZFS on Pine64 it didn't work).Īnyway: I just wanted to point out that I built Netatalk on Xenial maybe 30 times within the last 6 months and it always worked flawlessly (though same with Jessie before ) With Armbian and the +40 ARM boards we support it's different since there's only legacy kernel no one really cares of or mainline (sometimes something in between, see 4.4 LTS kernel for Marvell ARMADA 38x). That's also mostly x86 where situation is different since kernel is also provided by distro core team (Debian or Canonical) unless you decide to switch from distro kernel to mainline. The latter try to switch in customer installations to Ubuntu LTS where possible since. Sorry, my remark was totally unrelated to Armbian and I failed to differentiate between 'we' (Armbian team) and 'we' (my company and externals). Doesn't apply to Armbian at all since on ARM I wouldn't recommend ZFS but btrfs instead when running mainline kernel.ĭoes this actually mean that Debian is being dropped completely and Armbian will use Ubuntu from this point on ? Only restarts solved the problem so currently there seems to be a bug with ZFS on Xenial/x86. ![]() When testing a new storage cluster at a customer yesterday we ran into a nice bug with ZFS on Xenial (x86): file deletions didn't release the used space and since we did heavy testing with huge test files we ended up with a huge discrepancy between the really used space (du output) and what ZFS though (df / zfs list). ![]() Off-topic: Since I praised ZFS with Ubuntu 16.04 above. In other words: can't comment on why it doesn't work on Jessie and recommend using Xenial instead. I installed Netatalk on Xenial maybe 5 times the last 14 days (always x86) and it worked like a charme, Spotlight support included (but please read the notes, due to limitations of the event mechanism you run pretty fast in troubles if your volumes grow in size). Since Jessie's packages are so horribly outdated and since I was overwhelmed by how easy ZFS support in Ubuntu 16.04 has become (at least on x86) we do all new installations with Ubuntu Xenial only and drop Jessie where possible. You installed Netatalk on Debian 8 which only differs from a Jessie installation on x86 if armhf architecture has different packages. Please note that Armbian is not a distribution but a build system instead. I have no idea how to get it working on Armbian if you do, please drop a line below.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |